Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Writing or Selling?

I think I can write, but I know I can’t sell – it’s just not in my DNA, but all jobs require it.
There are people who can sell you any garbage they want to (an especially prevalent skill set in politics) but I can’t sell anything, even if I know you’re looking for it. This can be a problem, because all jobs require selling. It starts at the very beginning when you apply for a job – you’re trying to sell your services to an employer, and the more adept you are at selling, the more likely the sale will happen (you’ll be hired) and the more likely it is that the pay will increase with each negotiation.
I guess that’s why I also hate job-searching – the process doesn’t play to my strengths.
In addition, throughout your tenure, opportunities will come up to convince (sell) your employer, co-workers, and customers on ideas and decisions. This is why salesmen are always in demand.
We sell throughout life – securing a spouse, negotiating what game we’re playing with friends, what kind of pizza (there is no other type of food, right?) we’re going to order, what house, what town, what …
After 2-1/2 years of indie publishing without generating a lot of sales volume, I’ve decided to give Kindle Select a test drive on a couple of my stories (“Anti-Social” and “Reconcilable Differences”.) I resisted doing this before, because it means that the stories I put in the Kindle Select program can’t be sold ANYWHERE ELSE. As Dean Wesley Smith says, it makes no sense to limit your sales to ONLY Amazon.
However, Amazon puts a huge pool of money out there to distribute among the eBooks that are borrowed through the Kindle Lending Library or other Amazon programs – even if someone only reads 10% of one, the author gets a share of that money. This may work into a more profitable use of “free” giveaways than my ill-fated attempts at free earlier this year.
We’ll see whether it works – the eBooks need to stay in the program for 90 days. Who knows – it might bring in a little more money, maybe even generate a little more traffic to my other publications. Obviously, just writing isn’t enough – I have to find ways to sell.
Now, I’m not blind to the possibility that I don’t know how to write anything interesting enough to buy. But as POOR A SALESMAN as I am, the fact that anyone has bought stories from me… well, I MUST be writing something worth reading.
Just saying…
<<<>>> 

William Mangieri’s writing (including his latest ePublication: “Close Enough”) can be found in many places, such as:

Connect with him on Facebook at:   http://www.facebook.com/NoTimeToThink

Monday, September 22, 2014

Commitment

There’s an Aesop’s fable about The Bat, the Birds, and the BeastsIn short, the Birds and Beasts are going to have a major battle with each other. Not sure who will win, the bat refuses to commit to either side (planning to avoid suffering any ill effects from the fight), but instead PEACE breaks out, so the bat tries to crash the celebrations in each camp, only to be shunned and driven out by both.
In most renditions of this story, the moral is stated as “He who is neither one thing nor the other has no friends”, but what this is really about to me is COMMITMENT. If you won’t stand for something, why would anyone else want to stand with you?
It’s hard to trust people who won’t make a decision because they don’t want to be caught making a mistake. It’s even harder to trust them when they try to palm their decisions and mistakes off on someone else.
None of us are perfect, and no one has a crystal ball. We are given free will (freedom to make decisions) not a free ride (freedom from consequences.) A sign of true leadership is to empower others around you to make decisions and doing what you can to ensure their success, while owning the failures along with them. Responsibility is about stopping the buck, not passing it.
So how did we wind up with a leader (misnomer) who leads from behind? Who sticks his finger in the air to see which way the winds of opinion polls are blowing before he makes a decision? Who only takes credit for good things that happen and is never responsible for the bad, regardless whether he was involved in either? (really, the answer is simple – he never committed to any one thing, and so the hope-filled and hope-seeking voters interpreted his forceful lack of commitment as a commitment to WHATEVER they wanted to see.)
There seems to be a pathology at work here.
How can someone say it wasn’t their idea to withdraw our troops from Iraq (which opened the door for ISIL), and then in a speech about stopping ISIL a couple of weeks later take credit for that same withdrawal?
And if you can’t back up your decision with firmness instead of backing away from it with a parsing of words, how do you expect to come up with anyone willing to truly commit to a coalition of the willing?
If only he could act (or be) committed.
Just saying…
<<<>>> 

William Mangieri’s writing (including his latest ePublication: “Close Enough”) can be found in many places, such as:
Connect with him on Facebook at:   http://www.facebook.com/NoTimeToThink


Monday, September 15, 2014

WHAT AM I WRITING TODAY

What does that title mean? Is it:
“What am I writing today?” (What topic will I write about?)
This is something that has recurred to me quite often over the decades, but even more so now in this age of emails and texts and tweets and LOLs. Our lives are being hosed by a flood of information, and it’s getting harder and harder to distinguish the important things from the junk.
“What? Am I writing today?” (Is this the day I’m supposed write? Am I going to?)
What period (pun intended) am I in? I’m not used to this undefined mass of characters – it makes my brain have to work harder to make sense of things. Misspelling (deliberate or otherwise) can be confusing, but usually you can understand whether they meant THEIR or THERE or THEY’RE. But my life needs structure- it must be full of question marks… and ellipses, if I’m going to get it right.
“What am I, writing today?” (What kind of person am I, to write on today, of all days?)
One of the hardest things about talking to people when they aren’t in the room with you is you lose a lot of subtext and intent that is conveyed through visuals – there is more meaning than just what the words carry.  A phone call loses part of this subtext, but at least you can still hear the punctuation accompanying the spoken words (most of us humans DO still use inflection when we speak.)
 “What am I writing? Today.” (What topic am I writing? Not tomorrow, but now.)
140 characters just doesn’t cut it – the punctuation is the first to go, and with it clarity. People who think that they know exactly that they’ve captured all the possible meanings in that text message they received also are the kind who think that they really can multi-task. Without single-minded focus, something is always missed.
 “What? Am I writing? Today?” (What are you asking me? You want to know if I’m writing? Today, or when?)
We need punctuation in our lives – something that helps us filter through everything and understand what it all means – the important parts. There are no shortcuts that give you a truer insight into what’s going on.
#whatamiwritingtoday
Really? A can of alphabet soup is not an effective form of communication.
Just saying…
<<<>>> 

William Mangieri’s writing (including his latest ePublication: “The Red Barrens”) can be found in many places, such as:
Connect with him on Facebook at:   http://www.facebook.com/NoTimeToThink


Monday, September 8, 2014

What Other People Think

We live in a highly interactive world, and whether a decision is personal, or social, or job-related, or civic, there is still a relationship involved. Other people are affected by the decision, and should have some input.
Aside from those who are affected, we also involve experts. No one can know everything there is to know, not even a polymath. We seek out people all the time for their expertise – doctors come to mind. The doctor is there to recommend a test or a treatment, but this isn’t ancient times (30 or so years ago) when doctors were treated like gods and would make the decisions, no questions asked; ultimately we have to collaborate with them on our health and make the final decision ourselves.
It’s good to be interested in what other people think. But it’s something completely different when you rely on others to DECIDE what’s best for you. Believe me, there are plenty of people out there who are more than willing to do that for you if you let them – how to vote, what to think, what’s good or bad, right or wrong. How to spend your money. What to do with your life.
You can’t leave all these decisions to someone else.
I think it’s a shame that at the same time in history when the chances and tools for collaboration have never been better, we also seem to have lost the ability to discriminate. What is discrimination? Discrimination has to do with judgment – the ability to look at things and make choices between what you prefer and what you reject. The word has developed a universally negative connotation nowadays (on thesaurus.com there isn’t a single positive synonym for discrimination in the first batch presented), but we all need to be able to discriminate - to judge between the multitude of choices and decide for ourselves what makes sense.
There’s a difference between listening to those others and letting them decide for you. I know it can be hard to stand on your own two feet and accept accountability for making a choice.
“What if I make the wrong decision?” you ask.
Well, life is full of imperfect options (and people) - there will always be mistakes (and opportunities to make better choices.)
“What if someone doesn’t like it and gets mad at me?”
You can’t make everyone happy, and peer pressure is NOT an acceptable criteria for making choices (it’s sad that our society is becoming more and more ruled by the INTIMIDATION of THE MOB.) We tell our kids that – have we grown up enough to listen to our own advice?
So yes – listen and watch and read as much as you can, but when it’s time, be responsible. Own your own mind. Own your own life. Make your own decisions.
Just saying…
<<<>>> 

William Mangieri’s writing (including his latest ePublication: “The Red Barrens”) can be found in many places, such as:

Connect with him on Facebook at:   http://www.facebook.com/NoTimeToThink

Monday, September 1, 2014

Do You Know When to Quit?

In Invincible (my favorite movie), Vince’s father tries to discourage him from trying out for the Eagles, telling him that “a man can only take so much failure.”
Just how much failure can a man take? At what point is it okay to give up?
I’m not normally a quitter – I usually describe myself as a person who refuses to tip his king. For those who don’t play chess, that means seeing that your situation has gotten so bad that there’s no point in continuing the game. You are most likely going to lose, so you signify that you have given up by tipping your king over. (I haven’t played chess in at least a decade, but this has transferred to my Scrabble playing, much to my wife’s annoyance.)
I believe that there is value in just completing a task, even if it seems to be a lost cause. In chess in particular, I tended to make rash and foolish mistakes, but I believe it’s possible for the opponent to do the same, so “it ain’t over till it’s over.”
But I also consider tipping the king to be a somewhat arrogant move, because when you do it, you are presuming that you know exactly what’s about to happen, and that you are SO SMART that there is no possible outcome other than what you’ve predicted. It’s like saying: “Yeah, sure you beat me, but don’t feel so smug, because I’M SMARTER THAN YOU, and I KNEW you would before you did, SO THERE!”
On a calmer note, I hear a lot of variations now of the phrase “it’s not the destination, it’s the journey.” Do you want to spend my life in a journey where people just keep giving up? Even if I’m on the winning side of this, there’s something dispiriting about my opponent not giving his all until it’s over.
What is the value of failure? Well, sometimes it can show where the problem is that’s preventing your success, the element you need to reach your goal. Failure isn’t something to be afraid of, but it isn’t something to strive for either. In this day and age of innovation as a buzzword, I can just see someone proudly proclaiming:
“Look how many times I’ve failed! A couple thousand more and I’ll achieve Edison’s level of failure.”
Does failure make success? No – TRYING makes success. It wasn’t Thomas Edison’s thousands of failures that resulted in the light bulb - it was that he kept trying. It wasn’t all the bad things that happened to Abraham Lincoln along the way, all the elections that he lost and hardships he went through – it was that he didn’t give up.
Whatever it is you are doing, no matter how often you fall or fail, pick yourself up, brush yourself off and DON’T QUIT. To make the most of the journey, KEEP TRYING.
Just saying…
<<<>>> 

William Mangieri’s writing (including his latest ePublication: “The Wolves Will Come”) can be found in many places, such as:

Connect with him on Facebook at:   http://www.facebook.com/NoTimeToThink

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Lasting Impressions

I’m not perfect (like you didn’t know that already) -  throughout my life, I’ve done a number of things wrong – too large a percentage to ignore, in fact. Even if you engage in the wrong behaviors, you need to do what you can to help promote the right ones.
Before I go further into this, let me make this perfectly clear: I am NOT advocating people deliberately going out and doing the wrong thing. At all times we should be trying to live the right way – do what we know is right, avoid what we know is wrong – but we are not angels, we are HUMAN BEINGS, and so we have to deal with the fact that we are all IMPERFECT.
We have to recognize that we are going to fail at times, but we still need to make the right impression for the sake of society. It is best if you have actual SUBSTANCE (truth, facts) behind the impression you are making, but for the sake of whatever relationship you are in (Job, Marriage, Parenting, Leadership, Politics, Foreign Relations, what have you), you must at least know how to use the right SYMBOLISM.
This is something that seems to have become lost in our 24-by-7 news cycle, everything out in the open society. No one seems to have an understanding that
1.     Everything you do can be seen by others.
This is because: lies are impossible to maintain forever (no matter how expert you think you are or how many people help you do it, inconsistencies will seep through), and nothing is private (not in public places, not in your mailbox, not in your trash can, and certainly not on the internet.)
2.    It isn’t uplifting to see humanity’s (and especially our role-models’) warts – it lowers all spirits rather than elevating anyone.
Think of the abundance of “reality TV” that’s out there – some of it is just plain ugly (like the Jerry Springer show on steroids), but even the ones that try to display us at our best tend to also emphasize the warts. The subliminal message that’s delivered here is “why should I try to do the best or right thing when no one else does?”
 We get a lot of negative guidance from political figures (who should REALLY understand the importance of impressions since it’s a MAJOR PART OF THEIR PROFESSION.) We’ve had a couple of recent presidents who have promoted doing the wrong thing and then doubling down by publicly lying about it (and yes, I’m talking about the last 2 Democrats to hold the office; a Republican doesn’t generally get the cover from the press or even his own party to be so blatantly dishonest. Heck, George W. was branded as a liar by people who can’t even be honest about what the meaning of “lie” is  - or of what the meaning of “is” is, for that matter.) This isn’t discouraged in the least by a citizenry that more and more thinks “Well, what do you expect? All politicians lie.”
3.    We are all role models.
That last one probably has a lot of you scratching their heads. How can I say that, when even “certifiable” role models (celebrities, sports figures, etc.) complain that they shouldn’t be treated as such? But they are, no matter how much they protest.
And so are all of us. Whether individually, or cumulatively, what we decide to proudly publicize of our own failings, what we decide to label as okay “because everyone does it” makes a difference. Folks: two, or 300 million, or 6 billion people doing the wrong thing doesn’t make it right, and sticking your head in the sand doesn’t either.
Let’s go back and look at the line I wrote in the 2nd paragraph, specifically the phrase “let me make this perfectly clear”; for those of us who experienced Watergate, this phrase has a particular connotation tied to lying and cheating – in essence, you will get the sense somewhere in the dark recesses of your mind that you can’t trust the veracity of whatever this person says next (even if you aren’t old enough to know what Watergate means, I believe this phrase has seeped into our POP CULTURE enough to hold that connotation.)
I DELIBERATELY chose this wording to illustrate a point about making impressions – you need to be aware of how things appear. Our current president, choosing to illustrate instead, his own tone-deafness, has chosen to use several variants of this (“let’s be clear”, “I want to be clear”, etc.) so frequently that it should probably be followed by a ™ mark. If you’re trying to get people to believe you, this is not the phrase you should use (especially if you already have an honesty deficit operating against you.)
We all need to be aware of the impressions we are pushing.
What does it tell your kids if you don’t make a point of impressing them with the difference between right and wrong? How do you expect them to try if you behave as though it doesn’t really matter? I know we live in a world where “Do as I say, not as I do” is considered a joke; still, there’s still value in in at least saying the right things. But you have to go beyond that – you need to act the role as well.
What does it tell people if you say something is heinous or unforgivable and won’t be tolerated, but then you don’t do anything serious about it (or, worse, yet, you show how important it is by continuing your perpetual vacation)? Do these lines in the sand have any real meaning? Why would your adversary (or anyone else) treat it as important if you don’t either? Why would anyone take you seriously.
You can’t write everything in washable paints. They may be great for your kids to use around the house, but they don’t leave much of an impression (they’re designed to go away, you know – we use them when we’re afraid people are going to make mistakes – when we’re afraid to commit.) If you want to show that you’re serious, act like it. Maybe you should use permanent markers instead.
Just saying…
<<<>>> 

William Mangieri’s writing (including his latest ePublication: “The Wolves Will Come”) can be found in many places, such as:
Connect with him on Facebook at:   http://www.facebook.com/NoTimeToThink


Monday, August 18, 2014

Tolerance, Anyone?

The following post may contain some flippant treatment of serious EVIL – reader discretion (and appreciation of sarcasm) is advised.

Tolerance seems to be making the headlines a lot lately.
ISIS (or whatever they’re calling themselves) doesn't believe in diversity of anything. There is only ONE WAY to talk, ONE WAY to act, ONE WAY to believe, and if you aren't aligned with that ONE WAY, then you should be DEAD (Wait - their ONE WAY or DEAD is actually TWO ways; am I’m being unfair to them? NOT.) They don’t TOLERATE the existence of another way, and they will force you to ACCEPT theirs.
Hamas is a little less picky – they don’t seem to care WHO dies – Israeli or Palestinian, Jew or Muslim, Man, Woman, or Child, as long as they get what they want, and Israel is wiped off the face of the earth. And then whoever else they decide needs to go so they can get whatever they think they’re entitled to. We can’t be TOLERATED, and we need to ACCEPT that.
I’m blessed to live in one of the most diverse, inclusive, and particularly TOLERANT countries on Earth. TOLERANCE means that even if you don’t ACCEPT how someone looks or believes, you don’t have to approve of them, or like them, or give them what they want, and you don’t KILL them for it.
Think about that – a country where citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, with a mix of every ethnic, religious, social, cultural group on Earth, and, for the most part, we manage to exist side by side without killing each other. How is that possible?
We were founded on the principles of the rights of the individual (not the group), and deep down, most of us understand that each individual has the right to exist as much as any other. We can all believe what we want – there is no enforced religion or GROUP THINK.
Of course, it would be hard to tell that nowadays. Where it used to be okay for people of different beliefs to discuss those differences openly in public, a POLITICAL CORRECTNESS has emerged that makes WRONG THINKING punishable by the loss of the right to speak, or earn a living. TOLERANCE is no longer enough; there must be total ACCEPTANCE (of course, only of the “right” things); anything less and you will be shunned.
The greatest damage done by political correctness is that we can no longer have open, honest debate in this country. What used to be considered common sense is now backwards and oppressive, and anyone who expresses a thought to the contrary, defends ages old cultural beliefs is intimidated and silenced through insults character assassination. Once you start having to hold back on our TRUTH and CANDOR for some things, it cripples our ability to contribute fully on anything.
Science is not consensus driven – you must have all the facts (not just your own) in order to make discoveries and solve problems. Silencing (or hiding) an opinion or fact that doesn't fit your template doesn't prove your theory.
The same goes with any other attempt to understand a situation and come up with solutions. Shouting down other viewpoints, calling the opposition names and threatening them for speaking openly and honestly doesn’t solve any problem – it just creates more.
Group think isn’t thinking. Things will only get worse if we can’t talk openly with AND HEAR each other. Failure to listen to and tolerate ideas other than your own makes true understanding impossible.
(And you thought I was going to say something about Ferguson, Missouri. I am SO TIRED of group identification overpowering the honesty and integrity of the individual…)
Don’t just go with the herd. Raise your head up above it all every once and a while, and make sure you know where the cliff is.
Just saying…
<<<>>> 

William Mangieri’s writing (including his latest ePublication: “The Wolves Will Come”) can be found in many places, such as:
·         His Amazon Author page: http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B008O8CBDY
Connect with him on Facebook at:   http://www.facebook.com/NoTimeToThink